For performance agencies
A senior buyer on each client account.
Starting with the one you can't afford to lose. Adgent reads each client's Meta and Google as one brain overnight — one account at a time, each with its own baselines — and applies the fix the moment your team approves. Your workspace lists every client with its own health score, so the ones that need you sort to the top.
Running your own spend instead? See Adgent for in-house teams →
You don't have a data problem. You have more accounts than senior hours.
Every account you win adds work your seniors already don't have time for. So the quiet ones get looked at when a client asks — and that gap is where accounts are lost, not where anyone did the job badly.
You reported a great month. The client's P&L disagreed.
This is how good agencies lose accounts they were doing good work on. Every report you pull says grow, because the platform can only count the purchase it was paid for and stops there. Your client is looking at what the month did to the business. When those two diverge, you are the one who looks wrong.
What the deck said
3.2×
ROAS · conversions up
→ "Strong quarter. Let's scale."
Sourced straight from the platform. Every tool in the stack agrees.
What the client's own books said
−8%
margin · repeat purchase falling
→ "So why is the business flat?"
The client's number, not ours — it reaches Adgent only if they hand it over, as a sheet it opens read-only. What Adgent checks itself is narrower and harder to argue with: what the client's own analytics recorded, against what Meta and Google claimed for the same days.
Being the one who says "don't scale this yet — here's what it's doing to your margin" is what a client renews for. You can only say it if something is reading more than the platform's own scorecard — what their analytics recorded, next to what Meta and Google claim.
Every client account gets the read — and your team gets the answer in the room.
Worth being precise about how the sorting works: each account is analyzed on its own, and the workspace lists the results side by side — a card per client with its own health score, its own open actions and the date it was last read, sorted so the urgent ones come first. That is a triage list built from separate reads, not one analysis that compared your clients to each other. Nothing is benchmarked against another client's account.
One tool, every account
Meta and Google for every client you connect — each one read on its own, each with its own morning brief. The same read on the fortieth account as on the first, and one client's spike never colors another client's numbers.
Junior teams, senior output
Your juniors run at senior-level judgment. The analyst catches what checklists miss and explains the why — so they learn as they go instead of escalating.
Walk into the review with the why
Your team stops presenting what happened and starts explaining why, with the evidence one tap underneath. The client hears a strategist, not a reporter.
Three locks — because the mistake would land in someone else's account.
A vendor's error inside a client account becomes your error the moment the client notices. So the locks are structural, not a promise about how careful we are.
LOCK 01
Read-only by default
A client account you connect cannot be written to at all. You can put Adgent on the logo you least want to explain and nothing in it moves — which is also the answer when that client asks what you just gave access to.
LOCK 02
Nothing reaches the account without an approval
Each change arrives as a proposal with its reasoning attached and waits for someone on your team to approve it. Anything irreversible stops there and says so first.
LOCK 03
You can answer "what changed, and when"
The Change Ledger keeps every write Adgent made with the state it replaced, and the reverse runs the same way as the change: Adgent proposes the inverse, your team approves, it executes. Edits made straight in Meta or Google are read from the platforms' own change feeds — those it can date and attribute for you, not undo. That is the difference between telling a client you'll look into it and telling them what happened on the 14th.
There is a fourth thing it does that no client ever asks for: when the evidence is too thin to call — a handful of conversions, an attribution window still open — the Trust Gate marks the metric untrustworthy instead of handing your team a confident figure that falls apart in the review.
What an agency asks before it connects a client's account.
What access do you need — and what about the accounts I don’t manage?
Does my client see any of this?
How do I move between eighteen client accounts?
What happens when a client leaves?
Pick the client account nobody opened this week.
Connect it read-only — nothing in it can move — and we'll show you the morning brief Adgent would write for that client, plus the two or three changes it would ask your team to approve. You're judging it on a live account, not on our slides.
And where we'd tell you not to bother this quarter: if the thing you actually need is one view that ranks your clients against each other — an agency-wide benchmark, a blended portfolio read, "which of my forty accounts is worst" — Adgent will not give it to you. It reads one client per session by design. Buy reporting for that question, and come back for the read inside each account.
The account nobody opened this month is the one that drifts.
Not the one on fire — that one gets attention. The quiet one keeps spending to a target it stopped clearing, and the report still looks fine.
- everyaccount read overnight, including the quiet ones
- 3.2×ROAS in the deck, on a client whose own books disagreed
- read-onlyby default — connecting one moves nothing